Tuesday, December 27, 2005

Of Shootings, Teenagers and Politicians

Yesterday, Toronto was once again rocked by gunfire, this time killing a 15 year old girl, and wounding six or so other bystanders.

The culprits were in their late teens and early twenties - no surprise there.

Of course, both Stephen Harper and Paul Martin had to make their obligatory statements about the tragedy. From Stephen Harper, we get yet another example of how utterly clueless he can be about real issues:


Harper said Martin's call for a ban on handguns is not the answer, and that the government should be enforcing laws already on the books.


Like a great many politicians, Mr. Harper seems to be completely oblivious to the problems involved in "enforcing" some of the laws on the books. Our police forces have limited resources, as do our customs and immigration officials. Between the fact that guns are readily disassembled into individual parts, and handguns can be remarkably small, it's not difficult to see how they flow into Canada through ports of entry. It would be relatively trivial to move a batch of gun barrels as part of a shipment of machinery parts for manufacturing equipment, and most people would never notice them, or think anything odd of it.

The cold, hard reality is that we have to recognize that our border with the United States is porous in both directions, and that the American "gun culture" will seep through to some degree, regardless of existing laws. While I have no objection to stiff penalties for people who use guns in a criminal way, the fact is that we cannot practically do much to prevent criminals from getting guns. Short of turning our nation into a police state, criminals will find ways to acquire firearms, and those that do are not likely to consider "the law" to be a deterrent. (at the age of 20, most people think that they have all the answers, and they are invulnerable)

Of course, after a recent incident in Calgary where a young girl's father tried to fire a handgun at her at point-blank range because he didn't like her current boyfriend, I'm still an advocate for gun controls. She had the foresight to empty the gun of its ammunition - an act which no doubt saved her life. Her father was stupid enough to keep the gun "at hand" in the family living room, and chose to use it in a fit of anger. Even if he had engaged in the most basic precautions for firearms storage (weapons lockers, unloaded, ammunition in a separate locker etc.), he probably would have cooled off enough by the time he put it all together to stay his hand. (If he didn't, he would have had time to form intent, which would have made a fatal result 1st degree murder)

Mr. Harper - and Mr. Martin for that matter - need to step back from talk of "tougher laws" and "stronger enforcement", and take a long look at the social conditions that make gang life appealing to the teenagers in our larger cities. Law enforcement is necessary, but it will only be effective if we pair it with sensible approaches that address the root problems that are involved.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

But the root problem - why do we see life as so cheap? I've said it before, and perhaps it bears stating again. We expose our youth to newspapers, the news, movies, TV, music, anime, comics... the list goes on - which shows killing as part of the 'norm'. It is the solution used on TV by the bad guys - as well as the good guys. Violence is part of our culture.

Our youth emulate the values that they percieve are held by our society. Death? Oh, well, it's a nice looking gun that goes 'boom!'; we're tough - we're part of a gang and we're COOL! Someone insults them and rather than slapping them across the face, they pull a gun or a knife to seek revenge. A lot of anger - and misplaced reaction there.

Go back fifty, or a hundred years. Violence? A relative rairity. You read about it in the papers on occasion - but it is happening far away and doesn't impact your life. When you see death or injury you avert your eyes as the image sears into your brain, and you cringe in horror... today's kids just keep staring at the 'ol hypnogourd, jaws loosly slapping together as the work on a chunk of gum.

Do I advocate big brother censoring the media? No, but I do advocate mom and dad bringing a modicum of sense to the picture at hand - and teaching their young a few morals, the difference between right and wrong, as well as a few ways of coping with a conflict without emulating 'Arnie' and reaching for the heavy weaponry.

The Cass Review and the WPATH SOC

The Cass Review draws some astonishing conclusions about the WPATH Standards of Care (SOC) . More or less, the basic upshot of the Cass Rev...